From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ismael Olea To: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: I'm trying to set up docbook-tools... Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 09:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <396368E9.95CC5D75@hispalinux.es> References: <200007041511.LAA15779@snark.thyrsus.com> <00070410352500.07357@ehome.inhouse> <00070510365404.00678@needaguru> <00070422425701.09328@ehome.inhouse> <002501bfe690$04331940$1403a8c0@cogent.ca> X-SW-Source: 2000-q3/msg00017.html Message-ID: <20000705095700.hw5dZyDkBSdwn0lPAbQiElx3f9rnsVU36Vf20wb37aE@z> Sam Roberts escribió: > them. You can use jade without docbook or norm's style sheets, you can use > jadetex without using docbook, the db2* scripts are so optional most people > write their own, and you don't have to use emacs to edit sgml, but it helps. We have a little problem with these tools. There aren't a more-or-less sgml suite made of components (packages) with well made package dependeces. Then, if you want to use linuxdoc, your package system'll ask for sp, linuxdoc-dtd and its filters. If you want XML DocBook, the packages we all know. Add a new package (TEI?) could need to add it's dtd, the stylesheets and maybe some interface. What do you think? -- A.Ismael Olea González mailto:olea@hispalinux.es http://www.hispalinux.es/~olea 2:345/108.9@fidonet.org El mundo debe empezar a tener miedo a un planeta DEF