From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22951 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2002 08:13:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docbook-tools-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: docbook-tools-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22925 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2002 08:13:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (66.187.233.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Jul 2002 08:13:53 -0000 Received: from meme.surrey.redhat.com (meme.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.38]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g618Dqs17058; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 04:13:52 -0400 Received: (from twaugh@localhost) by meme.surrey.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g618Dp927085; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:13:51 +0100 Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 01:13:00 -0000 From: Tim Waugh To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C9ric_Bischoff?= Cc: Peter Toft , docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Any luck with DocBook/SGML 3.1 with Red Hat 7.3? Message-ID: <20020701091350.T8943@redhat.com> References: <20020630220155.S8943@redhat.com> <200207010950.02694.e.bischoff@noos.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0pkK7MCEo5hACTvx" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200207010950.02694.e.bischoff@noos.fr>; from e.bischoff@noos.fr on Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:50:02AM +0200 X-SW-Source: 2002-q3/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20020701011300.M9NAYCmppCQhSzKZGXjnJlFJjBy39KU5ATEI4zLTcYY@z> --0pkK7MCEo5hACTvx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 369 On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:50:02AM +0200, =C9ric Bischoff wrote: > On Sunday 30 June 2002 23:01, Tim Waugh wrote: > > The default value for %use-id-as-filename% is false. Turn it back on > > if you like, in a custom stylesheet. >=20 > Shouldn't we turn it on by default in the default stylesheet? No---doing so is a security risk. We've been through this. Tim. */ --0pkK7MCEo5hACTvx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 232 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9IA8+yaXy9qA00+cRAsoYAKC3lWmJoTQemZ+akwaVSu/IMpGzbgCggT4t 9eBB9AiBLgx/ukW1wvsKACg= =O/uH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0pkK7MCEo5hACTvx--