From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30103 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2002 06:33:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docbook-tools-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: docbook-tools-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30095 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2002 06:33:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (66.187.233.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Jul 2002 06:33:06 -0000 Received: from meme.surrey.redhat.com (meme.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.38]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g646X3s16463; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 02:33:03 -0400 Received: (from twaugh@localhost) by meme.surrey.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g646X2U09037; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 07:33:02 +0100 Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 23:33:00 -0000 From: Tim Waugh To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C9ric_Bischoff?= Cc: Peter Toft , docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Any luck with DocBook/SGML 3.1 with Red Hat 7.3? Message-ID: <20020704073302.F25750@redhat.com> References: <20020702231711.I8943@redhat.com> <20020703225237.E25750@redhat.com> <200207040616.26922.e.bischoff@noos.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="10jrOL3x2xqLmOsH" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200207040616.26922.e.bischoff@noos.fr>; from e.bischoff@noos.fr on Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 06:16:26AM +0200 X-SW-Source: 2002-q3/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20020703233300.4cI-czlKiw3OKsSlYK8hj4YB_o1ug24_HOQl4iyYg48@z> --10jrOL3x2xqLmOsH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 867 On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 06:16:26AM +0200, =C9ric Bischoff wrote: > > Take a look at the docbook-utils.dsl file from the docbook-utils > > tarball. This is what you're after I think. There is a more > > complicated one in the Red Hat Linux docbook-utils RPM, too. >=20 > The problem with this file is: > - that it is shared among all users > - that you need root access to modify it >=20 > But I think that someone can simply achieve what we are speaking about by= =20 > copying this file locally in his/her home directory, changing the desired= =20 > options, and specifying on the command line that this file has to be used= =20 > with the -d option. Indeed, that's what I meant. > Of course, jw and others could try such a local > $HOME/.docbook-utils.dsl file without the user having to say that it > should be used. That would be a good idea, yes. Tim. */ --10jrOL3x2xqLmOsH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 232 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9I+wdyaXy9qA00+cRAvWfAJ4nBJ43XL67r0TpIlUVdFMb3jlTbACfcTLm 9Ax6Jk2MyOoqEnhjJYKFluM= =BG0R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --10jrOL3x2xqLmOsH--