From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31905 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2002 09:51:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docbook-tools-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: docbook-tools-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31896 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2002 09:51:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ns.bureau-cornavin.com) (212.198.251.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Jul 2002 09:51:54 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by ns.bureau-cornavin.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g649qJw21103; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 11:52:19 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: =?iso-8859-1?q?=C9ric=20Bischoff?= To: Tim Waugh Subject: Re: Any luck with DocBook/SGML 3.1 with Red Hat 7.3? Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 02:51:00 -0000 Cc: Peter Toft , docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com References: <20020702231711.I8943@redhat.com> <200207040616.26922.e.bischoff@noos.fr> <20020704073302.F25750@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20020704073302.F25750@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <200207041152.19253.e.bischoff@noos.fr> X-SW-Source: 2002-q3/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20020704025100.G7yyEkM85xJ1YoZMH6B90_Buwp8EmE01u2eR-rujNRI@z> On Thursday 04 July 2002 08:33, Tim Waugh wrote: > > The problem with the docbook-utils.dsl file is: > > - that it is shared among all users > > - that you need root access to modify it > > > > But I think that someone can simply achieve what we are speaking about = by > > copying this file locally in his/her home directory, changing the desir= ed > > options, and specifying on the command line that this file has to be us= ed > > with the -d option. > > Indeed, that's what I meant. I guessed so, I just tried to answer in advance to objections that could be= =20 made to you ;-) > > Of course, jw and others could try such a local > > $HOME/.docbook-utils.dsl file without the user having to say that it > > should be used. > > That would be a good idea, yes. ... and an old one too, we just never found the time to implement it. It also has the little complication that "jw" is not docbook-specific. "jw"= =20 could be used with TEI for example, so that local file name should depend o= n=20 the DTD that is being used. --=20 =C9ric Bischoff