From: "Éric Bischoff" <e.bischoff@noos.fr>
To: Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Toft <pto@sslug.dk>, docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Any luck with DocBook/SGML 3.1 with Red Hat 7.3?
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200207041152.19253.e.bischoff@noos.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020704073302.F25750@redhat.com>
On Thursday 04 July 2002 08:33, Tim Waugh wrote:
> > The problem with the docbook-utils.dsl file is:
> > - that it is shared among all users
> > - that you need root access to modify it
> >
> > But I think that someone can simply achieve what we are speaking about by
> > copying this file locally in his/her home directory, changing the desired
> > options, and specifying on the command line that this file has to be used
> > with the -d option.
>
> Indeed, that's what I meant.
I guessed so, I just tried to answer in advance to objections that could be
made to you ;-)
> > Of course, jw and others could try such a local
> > $HOME/.docbook-utils.dsl file without the user having to say that it
> > should be used.
>
> That would be a good idea, yes.
... and an old one too, we just never found the time to implement it.
It also has the little complication that "jw" is not docbook-specific. "jw"
could be used with TEI for example, so that local file name should depend on
the DTD that is being used.
--
Éric Bischoff
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: "Éric Bischoff" <e.bischoff@noos.fr>
To: Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Toft <pto@sslug.dk>, docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Any luck with DocBook/SGML 3.1 with Red Hat 7.3?
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 02:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200207041152.19253.e.bischoff@noos.fr> (raw)
Message-ID: <20020704025100.G7yyEkM85xJ1YoZMH6B90_Buwp8EmE01u2eR-rujNRI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020704073302.F25750@redhat.com>
On Thursday 04 July 2002 08:33, Tim Waugh wrote:
> > The problem with the docbook-utils.dsl file is:
> > - that it is shared among all users
> > - that you need root access to modify it
> >
> > But I think that someone can simply achieve what we are speaking about by
> > copying this file locally in his/her home directory, changing the desired
> > options, and specifying on the command line that this file has to be used
> > with the -d option.
>
> Indeed, that's what I meant.
I guessed so, I just tried to answer in advance to objections that could be
made to you ;-)
> > Of course, jw and others could try such a local
> > $HOME/.docbook-utils.dsl file without the user having to say that it
> > should be used.
>
> That would be a good idea, yes.
... and an old one too, we just never found the time to implement it.
It also has the little complication that "jw" is not docbook-specific. "jw"
could be used with TEI for example, so that local file name should depend on
the DTD that is being used.
--
Éric Bischoff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-04 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-20 19:23 Peter Toft
2002-06-30 13:21 ` Peter Toft
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Tim Waugh
2002-06-30 14:02 ` Tim Waugh
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Peter Toft
2002-07-01 14:22 ` Peter Toft
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Norman Walsh
2002-07-02 3:55 ` Norman Walsh
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Peter Toft
2002-07-02 13:48 ` Peter Toft
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Tim Waugh
2002-07-02 15:17 ` Tim Waugh
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Peter Toft
2002-07-03 13:50 ` Peter Toft
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Tim Waugh
2002-07-03 14:52 ` Tim Waugh
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Éric Bischoff
2002-07-03 21:16 ` Éric Bischoff
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Tim Waugh
2002-07-03 23:33 ` Tim Waugh
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Éric Bischoff [this message]
2002-07-04 2:51 ` Éric Bischoff
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Hugo van der Kooij
2002-07-03 14:04 ` Hugo van der Kooij
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Hugo van der Kooij
2002-07-03 13:59 ` Hugo van der Kooij
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Peter Toft
2002-07-03 14:01 ` Peter Toft
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Éric Bischoff
2002-07-01 0:49 ` Éric Bischoff
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Tim Waugh
2002-07-01 1:13 ` Tim Waugh
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Ismael Olea
2002-07-03 4:07 ` Ismael Olea
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Tim Waugh
2002-07-03 4:59 ` Tim Waugh
2002-12-20 19:23 ` Eric S. Raymond
2002-07-03 0:19 ` Eric S. Raymond
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200207041152.19253.e.bischoff@noos.fr \
--to=e.bischoff@noos.fr \
--cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=pto@sslug.dk \
--cc=twaugh@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).