From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Bischoff To: Gregory Leblanc Cc: "'Jorge Godoy'" , docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Evolution of the DocBook tools Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000 Message-id: <38B56373.6DB0AE5A@cybercable.tm.fr> References: X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00098.html Gregory Leblanc wrote: > [snip] > > Which programs don't recognize the CATALOG keyword? Jade and OpenJade > > work with no problems. Programs that don't work aren't in accordance > > with the specifications. Should we support them or "brake" them and > > make the author improve their programs? > > I'd break them, but I'm just a mean nasty guy... ;-) The best is to offer the choice. > > The problem with "iso-entities" is that some stylesheets refer to them > > on it's catalog. Making a patch in a packaged distribution (RPM, deb, > > etc.) is easy, but I don't know if it's good in a plain .tar.gz > > distribution (of course, a note saying that files were modified and > > the like would be enough). > > When everything gets hashed out, just make a .tar.gz. I'm quite sure that > we can get a .spec file written for RPMs, either by myself or somebody who's > better at it. debs should be easy to make from there. Already done (the .tar.gz and the .spec) Rest of the discussion on the new list please. -- Eric Bischoff - Documentation and Localization Caldera (Deutschland) GmbH - Linux for Business! Tel: +49 9131 7192 300 - Fax: +49 9131 7192 399 http://www.caldera.de/