From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Bischoff To: "'docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com'" Subject: Re: Evolution of the DocBook tools Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000 Message-id: <38B7105F.6FAE14BE@cybercable.tm.fr> References: X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00105.html Peter Ring wrote: > > Keep talking! > > I've been waiting for this subject to get some real focus. It seemed > that most SGML tool developers were happy hacking their means of > distribution (including introducing silly variants of SGML Open catalog > files), which is fine as long as you can pretend to own the poor users' > namespace. Well, you don't. > (snipped) > Comments? Thoughts? There is really a need for a good namespace. Join us on the new list, we will make a presentation of everyone's good ideas like your ones, and then reach a consensus. When the recommandations will be agreed by anyone, we will present them and try to make them accepted as a standard. -- Éric Bischoff - mailto:ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr __________________________________________________ \^o~_. .~. ______ /( __ ) /V\ Toys story \__ \/ ( V // \\ \__| (__=v /( )\ |\___/ ) ^^-^^ \_____( ) Tux Konqui \__=v __________________________________________________