From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Bischoff To: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: images in Docbook with Red Hat 6.2 Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000 Message-id: <38F66342.9FD5F778@cybercable.tm.fr> References: <38F65807.4905D5C@cybercable.tm.fr> <00af01bfa571$69317680$1403a8c0@cogent.ca> X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00159.html Sam Roberts wrote: > > > I'm currently using the following approach: > > > > > > > > stands for: > > "use foo.gif when making HTML files, foo.eps when printing > > to TeX." > > > > You can do create on the same model other entities like > > &jpg-eps;. It's not perfect, but it's simple and works. > > I assume we're talking the same thing here, Yes > and that you > use this technique only because you use BOTH gifs and > jpegs in the same document when it's formatted as html? Not necessarily in the same document. I'm using both gifs and jpegs, but usually in different documents. Anyway, it remains a problem if you hack the stylesheets. What is really a problem is that the file extension depends on the processing you apply to the document, while the docbook file should remain a simple source. And since you don't want to hack the document each time you use it differently, the solution needs to simply work from the command line. So I managed in a way that the only thing I need is the following definition in some external file: ]]> ]]> The stylesheets solution could perfectly work if there was a way to easily detect which extension(s) do exist for this file from DSSSL. -- Éric Bischoff - mailto:ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr __________________________________________________ \^o~_. .~. ______ /( __ ) /V\ Toys story \__ \/ ( V // \\ \__| (__=v /( )\ |\___/ ) ^^-^^ \_____( ) Tux Konqui \__=v __________________________________________________