From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Galassi <rosalia@lanl.gov>
To: Eric Bischoff <ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr>
Cc: Jochem Huhmann <joh@gmx.net>, docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: --parser and --nochunks are available
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000
Message-id: <87bt4o4z1l.fsf@portacipria.lanl.gov>
References: <00022612310000.03037@localhost.localdomain> <00022823241302.01946@localhost.localdomain> <38BC0BF9.1E8F29B8@cybercable.tm.fr> <00022920513400.00904@localhost.localdomain> <20000229121744.J15571@conectiva.com.br> <m31z5vmsrv.fsf@nova.revier.com> <38BD2E8F.A3A3F14@cybercable.tm.fr>
X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00138.html

    Eric> No, but db2man can become part of the docbook-utils ;-)

Definitely: this, together with all other such useful scripts (like
the texinfo ones) should be merged in.

For robustness of the distribution, though, we need to make sure that
there is a tight loop with the maintainers of these packages.

If they have a regular release process, we can latch in to it and use
it for packaging.  If they don't, we can invite them to maintain the
programs in our repository.