From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc@cu-portland.edu>
To: Ronald Hayden <rhayden@apple.com>
Cc: docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: DocBook roadmap?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:16:00 -0000
Message-id: <987120746.16802.0.camel@grego1.cu-portland.edu>
References: <B6FB884A.CAA5%rhayden@apple.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q2/msg00009.html

On 12 Apr 2001 16:28:59 -0700, Ronald Hayden wrote:
> > From: Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc@cu-portland.edu>
> > Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:09:40 -0700
> > To: docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: DocBook roadmap?
> > 
> > I haven't tried this myself (yet), but libxslt is very fast, and should
> > be stable and mostly bug-free at this point.  www.xmlsoft.org/XSLT I
> > think.  I know that KDE is planning to use this for their next release,
> > as will GNOME, for their next major release.
> 
> Does libxslt definitely handle DocBook?
> 
> I tried it a few weeks ago with no luck.

The DocBook XSL stylesheets are part of the regression tests for
libxslt, so yes, it definately works.  DV did a demo of it for me
recently, and it's pretty damn fast, but rather a memory hog. 
    Greg