From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory Leblanc To: 'Jorge Godoy' , Eric Bischoff Cc: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: RE: Evolution of the DocBook tools Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000 Message-id: X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00097.html Please, mail the list when that list is online, I'm enjoying this discussion. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jorge Godoy [ mailto:godoy@conectiva.com.br ] > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 4:45 AM > To: Eric Bischoff > Cc: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com > Subject: Re: Evolution of the DocBook tools > [snip] > Which programs don't recognize the CATALOG keyword? Jade and OpenJade > work with no problems. Programs that don't work aren't in accordance > with the specifications. Should we support them or "brake" them and > make the author improve their programs? I'd break them, but I'm just a mean nasty guy... > The problem with "iso-entities" is that some stylesheets refer to them > on it's catalog. Making a patch in a packaged distribution (RPM, deb, > etc.) is easy, but I don't know if it's good in a plain .tar.gz > distribution (of course, a note saying that files were modified and > the like would be enough). When everything gets hashed out, just make a .tar.gz. I'm quite sure that we can get a .spec file written for RPMs, either by myself or somebody who's better at it. debs should be easy to make from there. Greg Sun Hardware Reference Maintainer http://sun-ref.sunhelp.org/