From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 84504 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2019 09:04:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dwz-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: dwz-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 84493 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jun 2019 09:04:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.100.3 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-12.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=upgrading, HX-Languages-Length:1443, Allocatable, spent X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-HELO: mx1.suse.de X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Subject: Re: DWZ maintainance To: Mark Wielaard , Jakub Jelinek Cc: dwz@sourceware.org References: <20190617152609.GT19695@tucnak> From: Tom de Vries Message-ID: <02ba4ac9-e1d2-30fe-3bb2-662d8b9c76f2@suse.de> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-q2/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 On 18-06-19 10:37, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 17:54 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: >> On 17-06-19 17:26, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>> I thought I'd have some time to do dwz patch review and maintainance, >>> but apparently I don't, my GCC duties are full time. >>> So, I'd like to declare Tom as a co-maintainer if he is ok with that, >>> as I don't want to block progress. >> >> thanks, I'm definitely OK with that :) > > Great. Also my apologies for not having more time for dwz. But I am > around to help (and keep the buildbot alive). > Much appreciated :) >>> Once sufficient amount of changes is in, would be nice to roll a >>> new release. >> >> OK, makes sense. > > IMHO you could do a release now. There are a couple of bug fixes in > already since 0.12. Which I would say is certainly "sufficient" to > warrant a release (otherwise distros would have to backport them). And > it would show that dwz is alive and well :) I hope to spent next week (i.e. hackweek) in full on dwz, and to be able to push a couple of more fixes. In particular, I'd like to commit fixes for: - PR24249 - "Section offsets not monotonically increasing" - PR24251 - "Allocatable section after non-allocatable ones" which will mean that I can drop this ( https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory/dwz/dwz-0.12-ignore-nobits.patch?expand=1 ) patch when upgrading to the next dwz release. Thanks, - Tom