From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (wildebeest.demon.nl [212.238.236.112]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E02C385AC12 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 07:22:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 4E02C385AC12 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mark@klomp.org Received: from localhost (31-161-145-178.mobile.kpn.net [31.161.145.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 295AD30006B8; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 08:22:06 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain From: Mark Wielaard Subject: Re: dwz 0.14 release? To: Tom de Vries Cc: dwz@sourceware.org User-Agent: GaiaMail/0.2 Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 07:22:04 GMT Message-Id: <1615188125240.4e8674e7838ef@mozgaia> References: <5b6633862f257bac99fa3fccfde18b931ad10cf2.camel@klomp.org> <59176fae-d720-5a9c-e69c-2553706b7ff1@suse.de> <20210219011612.GK3149@wildebeest.org> <20210226233718.GG3014@wildebeest.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: dwz@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Dwz mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 07:22:09 -0000 Hi Tom, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 3/5/21 5:24 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: >> On 3/5/21 8:26 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: >>> AFAIC, from the open PR perspective, we're good for the release. >>> >>> I'll do one more round of gdb testing against dwz, and then hopefully = we >>> can release on Monday. >> >> That's done, I've tested against both target boards cc-with-dwz and >> cc-with-dwz-m. No regressions found. > > I've done a review of copyright in the toplevel files. AFAICT, that > looks good. Things look good for a release. > I can do the release (that is, running the scripts in contrib/release/* > and drafting release announcement). OK, or does anybody else want to do > that=3F Whatever is most convenient for you. If you like me to do it just ask. Thanks, Mark