From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (wildebeest.demon.nl [212.238.236.112]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14DAB3834408 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:39:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 14DAB3834408 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mark@klomp.org Received: from tarox.wildebeest.org (tarox.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E2CD30005B3; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:39:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by tarox.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 62F7140422D7; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:39:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54beb0a7ae1bb32cbd6b44fa9543ed4c91316891.camel@klomp.org> Subject: Re: [PUSHED] Update FSF Copyright years to include 2021. From: Mark Wielaard To: Tom de Vries , dwz@sourceware.org Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:39:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20210212122911.9094-1-mark@klomp.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-10.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: dwz@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Dwz mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:39:24 -0000 Hi Tom, On Sun, 2021-02-14 at 08:58 +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 2/12/21 1:29 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > This should have been done as part of commit f7c0d8afb > > "Sync dwarf2.{def,h} and dwarfnames.c from gcc/libiberty." >=20 > FWIW, there's a script contrib/release/gen-copyright-years.sh, that > comes to the same conclusion: > ... O nice, I wasn't aware of the contrib/release scripts. So we have everything needed to do a release there? Cheers, Mark