From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
Cc: dwz@sourceware.org, jakub@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add check-valgrind
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:09:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a1d98123-2d7a-ed82-9a5e-fc859a244eb7@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210325203254.GG2685@wildebeest.org>
On 3/25/21 9:32 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 02:57:17PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Add a make target check-valgrind, that applies valgrind to dwz when used in
>> the testsuite.
>>
>> Any comments?
>
> It might be good to simply always run under valgrind when it is
> installed. That makes make check slightly slower by default, but it
> makes sure things are always also ran under valgrind if available.
>
Hmm, makes sense. Make check with dwz-tests.exp goes from 11s to 34s on
my laptop, which is still bearable.
OTOH, I also run the external testsuite once in a while, and that one
goes from 1m19s to 15m17s, which I don't like as default behaviour.
So I'm not sure yet about making this the default.
> To make sure that a valgrind tool error really causes a check failure use
> --error-exitcode=99 (or some other non-zero code):
>
> --error-exitcode=<number> [default: 0]
> Specifies an alternative exit code to return if Valgrind reported
> any errors in the run. When set to the default value (zero), the
> return value from Valgrind will always be the return value of the
> process being simulated. When set to a nonzero value, that value is
> returned instead, if Valgrind detects any errors. This is useful
> for using Valgrind as part of an automated test suite, since it
> makes it easy to detect test cases for which Valgrind has reported
> errors, just by inspecting return codes.
>
Thanks, I've included that, and committed.
- Tom
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-26 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-25 13:57 Tom de Vries
2021-03-25 20:32 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-03-26 7:09 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a1d98123-2d7a-ed82-9a5e-fc859a244eb7@suse.de \
--to=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=dwz@sourceware.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=mark@klomp.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).