From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 95AE0385DC14; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:49:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 95AE0385DC14 From: "mark at klomp dot org" To: dwz@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug default/24251] Allocatable section after non-allocatable ones Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:49:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: dwz X-Bugzilla-Component: default X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mark at klomp dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: nobody at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: dwz@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Dwz mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:49:42 -0000 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D24251 --- Comment #20 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #19) > (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #18) > > You didn't provide such a reproducer. >=20 > I did in Comment 10. Moreover even if I did not (which I did) the Fedora > build.logs are freely available to anyone. You did not produce a reproducer. I can see the build.log but I cannot reproduce your issue. What I can see from the build.log is a situation that= I believe has been fixed by Tom. But it is impossible to be sure because you didn't provide an exact reproducer or binary. The binary I could reproduce is slightly different from the case you report= and seems to be a real bug in either the golang toolchain or the spec build fil= e. dwz correctly gives an error in that case. If you do provide a reproducer then I am happy to take a look at why Tom's = fix isn't working for you. But you cannot expect us to handwave at some build.l= og and make use figure out what you are exactly doing without having access to either the exact build environment or the actual binary you are seeing the issue with. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=