From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dwz-return-323-listarch-dwz=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8830 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2019 08:32:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dwz-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dwz.sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dwz@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dwz-help@sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dwz-subscribe@sourceware.org>
Sender: dwz-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 8741 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jul 2019 08:32:14 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: dwz@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug default/24766] [Regression]
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: dwz
X-Bugzilla-Component: default
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: nobody at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-24766-11298-iK8AEXYOcB@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-24766-11298@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-24766-11298@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-q3/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D24766

--- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Unsure what people want.  E.g. the rpm find-debuginfo.sh I think just
> ignores the return status of dwz, the program should either perform the
> compression if beneficial and possible, or give up, but neither case is s=
ome
> kind of error.

Confirmed, that's the case.

> The only "errors" are dwz assertion failures and even those should hopefu=
lly
> not break stuff, just worse case keep it uncompressed.

That's the case as well. [ I've had a report from somebody saying that chan=
ges
in OBS meant that a dwz assert broke a package build, but I'm not yet sure =
what
changes those are, I'm currently chasing that up. ]

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.