From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32661 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2020 21:16:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dwz-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: dwz-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32618 invoked by uid 48); 26 Jan 2020 21:16:38 -0000 From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" To: dwz@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug default/25459] Forward pseudo-reference triggers error Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: dwz X-Bugzilla-Component: default X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: nobody at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2020-q1/txt/msg00059.txt https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D25459 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- There are few things to consider here: - It would be good to be able to handle a forward pseudo-reference. Presuma= bly such a thing would be handled by doing two passes over .debug_info, much = like is done in low-mem mode. This ties in somewhat with PR25229 - "Add input verification phase". - another question is whether dwz should generate the code such as is prese= nt in clang-offload-bundler-10.debug. If this was a normal reference, the referenced DIE would have been forced into a partial unit. Should we do the same for pseudo-references? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.