From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5B42938708EC; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:37:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5B42938708EC From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" To: dwz@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug default/27464] New: CU referenced from PU (--odr-mode=link case) (bis) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:37:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: dwz X-Bugzilla-Component: default X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: nobody at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: dwz@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Dwz mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:37:21 -0000 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D27464 Bug ID: 27464 Summary: CU referenced from PU (--odr-mode=3Dlink case) (bis) Product: dwz Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: default Assignee: nobody at sourceware dot org Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org CC: dwz at sourceware dot org Target Milestone: --- Using the same assert as in PR25424, and using the tentative patch series, = we run into: ... $ dwz cc1.dwz-processed -o 1 -lnone --odr=20 dwz: /home/vries/dwz/dwz.git/dwz.c:12601: write_die: Assertion `IMPLIES (cu->cu_kind =3D=3D CU_PU, die_cu (refd)->cu_kind =3D=3D CU_PU)' failed. Aborted (core dumped) ... This is related to the duplicate chain: ... 28dd83f O b500801d 621b6872 pointer_type (type: 28dd72f die_struct structure_type) 2903769 O b500801d 621b6872 pointer_type (type: 28dd72f die_struct structure_type) ... which are both in the same CU: ... <0><28d281f>: Abbrev Number: 200 (DW_TAG_compile_unit) <1><28dd72f>: Abbrev Number: 35 (DW_TAG_structure_type) <28dd730> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x1b2ca6): die_struct <28dd734> DW_AT_byte_size : 80 <28dd735> DW_AT_decl_file : 87 <28dd736> DW_AT_decl_line : 3069 <28dd738> DW_AT_decl_column : 63 <28dd739> DW_AT_sibling : <0x28dd83b> <1><28dd83f>: Abbrev Number: 9 (DW_TAG_pointer_type) <28dd840> DW_AT_byte_size : 8 <28dd841> DW_AT_type : <0x28dd72f> <1><2903769>: Abbrev Number: 9 (DW_TAG_pointer_type) <290376a> DW_AT_byte_size : 8 <290376b> DW_AT_type : <0x28dd72f> <0><2911617>: Abbrev Number: 177 (DW_TAG_compile_unit) ... The dup chain is forced to a partial unit, but the die_struct DIE is not, because it's not part of a duplicate chain, and it's not marked as a single= ton. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=