From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 121751 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2019 08:37:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dwz-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: dwz-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 121741 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jun 2019 08:37:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.100.3 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*x:Evolution, HX-Languages-Length:895 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-HELO: gnu.wildebeest.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: DWZ maintainance From: Mark Wielaard To: Tom de Vries , Jakub Jelinek Cc: dwz@sourceware.org Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: <20190617152609.GT19695@tucnak> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-2.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-SW-Source: 2019-q2/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 17:54 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 17-06-19 17:26, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > I thought I'd have some time to do dwz patch review and maintainance, > > but apparently I don't, my GCC duties are full time. > > So, I'd like to declare Tom as a co-maintainer if he is ok with that, > > as I don't want to block progress. >=20 > thanks, I'm definitely OK with that :) Great. Also my apologies for not having more time for dwz. But I am around to help (and keep the buildbot alive). > > Once sufficient amount of changes is in, would be nice to roll a > > new release. >=20 > OK, makes sense. IMHO you could do a release now. There are a couple of bug fixes in already since 0.12. Which I would say is certainly "sufficient" to warrant a release (otherwise distros would have to backport them). And it would show that dwz is alive and well :) Cheers, Mark