From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27895 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2003 15:44:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact eclipse-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: eclipse-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27883 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2003 15:44:08 -0000 Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 15:44:00 -0000 From: Jan Schulz To: eclipse@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Recognizing gcj as default StandardVM (JRE System Library) Message-ID: <20030802154316.GA4009@katzien.de> References: <1059832556.11511.53.camel@elsschot.wildebeest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1059832556.11511.53.camel@elsschot.wildebeest.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 Hallo Mark, Just something about me: I'm the debian maintainer of the eclipse packages and I taking this list and the binaries as something to learn from :) I would really be happy if eclipse could be run with a free VM. Unfortunatelly I don't have much experience with gcj, so please be patient with me. But I will read up te required knowledge... * Mark Wielaard wrote: >It took me some time to convince eclipse to recognize gcj/gij/libgcj as >standard vm. Does this mean that eclipse will run with a (patched?) gcj as '*/bin/java' (not native, but in the VM)? [running natively] What will happen with all the plugins? Are they still recognised when eclipse is started as native binary? Are they still runable? >That way everything works out of the box for me. >(sun.boot.class.path is clearly not a documented standard system >property so Eclipse should really not use it.) File a bugreport :) Jan -- Jan Schulz jasc@gmx.net "Wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm."