From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eclipse-return-43-listarch-eclipse=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15978 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2003 04:29:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact eclipse-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:eclipse-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/eclipse/>
List-Post: <mailto:eclipse@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:eclipse-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: eclipse-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15969 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2003 04:29:23 -0000
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 04:29:00 -0000
To: eclipse@sources.redhat.com
Subject: GCC/GCJ versions?...
Message-ID: <20030808042906.GA17292@twcny.rr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode)
X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2

I notice you're using the tree-ssa version of GCJ (with extra patches?).

Is this essential, or is it possible to use the mainline version which 
will become GCC 3.4?  If mainline doesn't work, are the changes 
backportable?

It would certainly be nice if 3.4 could Do The Right Thing.

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  <neroden at gcc.gnu.org>
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html