From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30552 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2003 17:08:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact eclipse-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: eclipse-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30495 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2003 17:08:19 -0000 X-Originally_To: Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 17:08:00 -0000 From: Marcos Dione To: Tom Tromey Cc: eclipse@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: cannot build from srpm. Message-ID: <20030812141356.GF2137@sexy> References: <20030812115856.GD2137@sexy> <8765l2yik1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20030812133643.GE2137@sexy> <87smo6x2nu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87smo6x2nu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 10:26:45AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Marcos" == Marcos Dione writes: > What's important isn't the ssa-ness of the compiler, but rather that > the patches we added to gcj for eclipse are only available in this > RPM. > > I believe all the required ant patches are in rhug. > http://sources.redhat.com/rhug/ 'ant' patches? isn't gcj the patched one? or are both? I downloaded the srpm's (for ant and gcc-ssa) and I don't see anything big done to ant, but I see several patches (which I don't understand as I'm not familiar to gcj). hmmm, may be it's too big the changes to port it to debian :(