From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32244 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2004 11:05:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact eclipse-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: eclipse-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32196 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2004 11:05:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 11:05:00 -0000 From: Paul Nasrat To: Tom Tromey Cc: eclipse@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: naoko and building eclipse Message-ID: <20040106110123.GB30106@ensim.rackshack.net> References: <20031231232754.GN20129@ensim.rackshack.net> <877k06yrgf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877k06yrgf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-q1/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 03:13:20PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Nasrat writes: > > Paul> I'm trying to build eclipse on a rawhide system with naoko. > > BTW, which compiler are you using to do this? Rawhide which is gcc 3.5-tree-ssa 20031211 snapshot. > So if you are compiling our gcj-eclipse > snapshot with a version of gcj other than our special hacked version, > you'll have problems. The fix is pretty simple: rename instances of > "solib" in eclipse to "gcjlib" (you can't do this blindly as this word > is used in the CDT -- you have to look for places where we hacked > eclipse). Ok, looks as if I have to do this - hoping this fixes the core dumps I'm getting from the ant run - if not gdb trace later. > You can tell which version of gcj you've got by looking for the > directory libjava/gnu/gcj/protocol/solib in the source tree. If it > exists, you've got the older one. I assume you mean libjava/gnu/java/net/protocol - in which case it's gcj lib > This is a pain, I realize. Hopefully we'll have a new release out > sometime. Well there is a 23rd January devel freeze date for fc2 - I'd assume it'd be pushed to rawhide by then. Paul