From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25450 invoked by alias); 10 May 2004 20:50:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact eclipse-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: eclipse-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25438 invoked from network); 10 May 2004 20:50:34 -0000 Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 20:50:00 -0000 From: Paul Nasrat To: eclipse@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Fedora 2 & Eclipse Message-ID: <20040510204036.GB24703@lichen.truemesh.com> Reply-To: eclipse@sources.redhat.com References: <409FDFD8.5010103@comarb.gov.ar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <409FDFD8.5010103@comarb.gov.ar> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 05:02:32PM -0300, Ricardo Gorosito wrote: > Any news/progress about RH's Eclipse & Fedora 2? AFAIK oprifile is the > 'stopper'. The oprofile plugin is not really a stopper it is possible to build without as it's an additional plugin. I had Eclipse building with gcc-ssa and gcc34 mostly - ISTR the RHEL binaries were working for someone out of the box. The issues I hit are in the archives - solib/gcjlib, various link problems, etc. I'll have another play this week sometime. Paul