From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6709 invoked by alias); 10 May 2004 22:31:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact eclipse-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: eclipse-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6686 invoked from network); 10 May 2004 22:31:04 -0000 Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 22:31:00 -0000 From: Paul Nasrat To: Tom Tromey Cc: eclipse@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Fedora 2 & Eclipse Message-ID: <20040510222106.GC24703@lichen.truemesh.com> Reply-To: eclipse@sources.redhst.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 04:12:47PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > Paul> I had Eclipse building with gcc-ssa and gcc34 mostly - ISTR the > Paul> RHEL binaries were working for someone out of the box. The > Paul> issues I hit are in the archives - solib/gcjlib, various link > Paul> problems, etc. > > I got it building by basically s/solib/gcjlib/ in the eclipse patches. Yup - I've posted my patch to list before and you cast an eye on it and it seemed sane. > You need a small patch to SWT to make it build with the newer Gtk. Hmm, pretty sure got that far too. > Once this stuff is done, it seems to crash if you do anything real > with it; Anthony Green claimed better success but I'm not sure under > what conditions. IIRC I got splash and stuff working correctly then barfing on various runtime linking issues. This could be me, and I'm not overly familiar with how gcj/eclipse deals with hybrid .so/java stuff. It strikes me that it should be at least something that should go into Fedora Extras for FC2 eventually. I'll rebuild and log and try and poke people here - I've had a lot of out of channel intrest from people via jpackage and other forums for native eclipse so I would personally like to see it in fedora once all the pain is gone. Paul