From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eclipse-return-97-listarch-eclipse=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28362 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2004 02:26:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact eclipse-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:eclipse-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/eclipse/>
List-Post: <mailto:eclipse@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:eclipse-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: eclipse-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28351 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2004 02:26:16 -0000
Message-ID: <40317BD6.8000901@eznet.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 02:26:00 -0000
From: "David A. Frantz" <wizard@eznet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031114
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: eclipse@sources.redhat.com
Subject: RE: eclipse in fedora core 2 test 1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-q1/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2

A very good question Scott.    I was also under the impression that gcj 
based eclipse was waiting for FC2.   That is a game plan that needs to 
be played out.

Eclipse os one of those Java applications that just cries out for native 
execution.   It would be very interesting to know the status of the 
build as info on progress with the gcj build of eclipse is hard to come buy.

Dave