From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11745 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2003 14:03:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact eclipse-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: eclipse-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11736 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2003 14:03:05 -0000 Message-ID: <5F84A09ECDD5D411973000508BE3247020EF6816@exnyc07.lehman.com> From: "Eastwick, Adam" To: "'tromey@redhat.com'" Cc: "'eclipse@sources.redhat.com'" Subject: RE: RPM question from the native compiled page Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:03:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) X-WSS-ID: 1377649B522802-02-01 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BigFish: v X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 Hi Tom, __________________Error Log_________________ Hi Tom, Thanks for confirming what the -vm option did, we could not get the application working without using that, but I was unsure whether or not this would be used internally by the application, or simply as a resource for some of the plugins we might have. The version listed is 2.0.1 with a build id of 2003032772130. Looks like our libgcj-ssa RPM was slightly out of date, when checking I did not examine the date-stamp inside the RPM name, compared against the other lib***-ssa dependencies. I am now able to load the application and it runs much faster now. I was receiving a series of java errors when I attempted to run, and in hind-sight this is due to the outdated RPM not having something that was needed and most likely causing an issue with the gcjlauncher that is part of the eclipse start-up. Thanks! This was a big help. -Adam -----Original Message----- From: Tom Tromey [mailto:tromey@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 9:34 PM To: Eastwick, Adam Cc: 'eclipse@sources.redhat.com' Subject: Re: RPM question from the native compiled page >>>>> "Adam" == Eastwick, Adam writes: Adam> It seems to indicate that this is a 2.0.1 release instead of 2.1.0 Yeah, that's fixed here. I don't remember if this fix made it into beta 2 (which, btw, is a public beta) or not. Adam> It takes way too long to load for not using a JVM, although I Adam> cannot get it to start without using a -vm option. Hmm. If you use -vm , then it is starting with whatever vm you tell it. Make sure you have all the prerequisites. What happens when you just invoke "eclipse"? Do you get anything in workspace/.metadata/.log? Adam> I downloaded the snapshot-xxxxxx-.eclipse-2.1.0-12.rpm from the Adam> ~jhealy page. Is this the correct one, or am I doing something wrong? That should be it. Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice.