public inbox for eclipse@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RPM question from the native compiled page
@ 2003-09-17 21:09 Eastwick, Adam
  2003-09-18  1:41 ` Tom Tromey
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eastwick, Adam @ 2003-09-17 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'eclipse@sources.redhat.com'

I downloaded this and when I run a couple of odd things happen:

It seems to indicate that this is a 2.0.1 release instead of 2.1.0

It takes way too long to load for not using a JVM, although I cannot get it
to start without using a 
-vm <path to JVM> option.

The fact that I need to pass it a -vm option seems strange since you should
not need to do this.

I downloaded the snapshot-xxxxxx-.eclipse-2.1.0-12.rpm from the ~jhealy page
Is this the correct one, or am I doing something wrong?

I have other versions of eclipse on my network, but am explicitly calling
/usr/bin/eclipse.  Is there some caching from previous sessions happening
perhaps?

-Adam


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of
this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This
communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as
an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial
product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official
statement of Lehman Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this information is
complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.  All
information is subject to change without notice.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: RPM question from the native compiled page
  2003-09-17 21:09 RPM question from the native compiled page Eastwick, Adam
@ 2003-09-18  1:41 ` Tom Tromey
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2003-09-18  1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eastwick, Adam; +Cc: 'eclipse@sources.redhat.com'

>>>>> "Adam" == Eastwick, Adam <aeastwic@lehman.com> writes:

Adam> It seems to indicate that this is a 2.0.1 release instead of 2.1.0

Yeah, that's fixed here.  I don't remember if this fix made it into
beta 2 (which, btw, is a public beta) or not.

Adam> It takes way too long to load for not using a JVM, although I
Adam> cannot get it to start without using a  -vm <path to JVM> option.

Hmm.  If you use -vm <path to JVM>, then it is starting with whatever
vm you tell it.

Make sure you have all the prerequisites.  What happens when you just
invoke "eclipse"?  Do you get anything in workspace/.metadata/.log?

Adam> I downloaded the snapshot-xxxxxx-.eclipse-2.1.0-12.rpm from the
Adam> ~jhealy page. Is this the correct one, or am I doing something wrong?

That should be it.

Tom

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: RPM question from the native compiled page
@ 2003-09-18 14:03 Eastwick, Adam
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eastwick, Adam @ 2003-09-18 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'tromey@redhat.com'; +Cc: 'eclipse@sources.redhat.com'

Hi Tom,

     
__________________Error Log_________________
Hi Tom,

     Thanks for confirming what the -vm option did, we could not get the
application working without using that, but I was unsure whether or not this
would be used internally by the application, or simply as a resource for
some of the plugins we might have.  The version listed is 2.0.1 with a build
id of 2003032772130.

	Looks like our libgcj-ssa RPM was slightly out of date, when
checking I did not examine the date-stamp inside the RPM name, compared
against the other lib***-ssa dependencies.  I am now able to load the
application and it runs much faster now.  I was receiving a series of java
errors when I attempted to run, and in hind-sight this is due to the
outdated RPM not having something that was needed and most likely causing an
issue with the gcjlauncher that is part of the eclipse start-up.

	Thanks!  This was a big help.

-Adam

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Tromey [mailto:tromey@redhat.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 9:34 PM
To: Eastwick, Adam
Cc: 'eclipse@sources.redhat.com'
Subject: Re: RPM question from the native compiled page

>>>>> "Adam" == Eastwick, Adam <aeastwic@lehman.com> writes:

Adam> It seems to indicate that this is a 2.0.1 release instead of 2.1.0

Yeah, that's fixed here.  I don't remember if this fix made it into
beta 2 (which, btw, is a public beta) or not.

Adam> It takes way too long to load for not using a JVM, although I
Adam> cannot get it to start without using a  -vm <path to JVM> option.

Hmm.  If you use -vm <path to JVM>, then it is starting with whatever
vm you tell it.

Make sure you have all the prerequisites.  What happens when you just
invoke "eclipse"?  Do you get anything in workspace/.metadata/.log?

Adam> I downloaded the snapshot-xxxxxx-.eclipse-2.1.0-12.rpm from the
Adam> ~jhealy page. Is this the correct one, or am I doing something wrong?

That should be it.

Tom

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of
this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This
communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as
an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial
product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official
statement of Lehman Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this information is
complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.  All
information is subject to change without notice.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-18 14:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-17 21:09 RPM question from the native compiled page Eastwick, Adam
2003-09-18  1:41 ` Tom Tromey
2003-09-18 14:03 Eastwick, Adam

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).