From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32294 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2003 20:01:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact eclipse-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: eclipse-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32252 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2003 20:01:15 -0000 To: Mark Wielaard Cc: eclipse@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Running native eclipse on Debian (unstable/x86) References: <1062773014.3316.49.camel@elsschot> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: Send your questions to ``ASK ZIPPY'', Box 40474, San Francisco, CA 94140, USA Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 20:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1062773014.3316.49.camel@elsschot> Message-ID: <87ad9jau4p.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard writes: Mark> Then get the following RPMs: Mark> (Is there a more recent snapshot?) Nope. The bad news is, I'm don't think there will be another snapshot. The good news is, most of the gcj patches are now in the public gcc cvs repository. One of the changes will require a change to eclipse, since we changed the name of the new URL handler. The changes to eclipse haven't been pushed out yet, but that should also happen. I don't have a timeline for that yet, it really depends on how different internal projects go. (Whether or not eclipse.org will accept them is anybody's guess, but at least they'll show up in bugzilla...) Mark> Which don't seem to exist anymore. Hmm. I don't know how that works. But there's a new beta out, which should have everything in it. If the binaries aren't there, the SRPM still should be. Tom