From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13432 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2003 17:43:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact eclipse-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: eclipse-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13414 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2003 17:43:13 -0000 To: listas@lozano.eti.br Cc: eclipse@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Current Eclipse on Red Hat References: <20031124203717.EA9D91A867E@smtp.infolink.com.br> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: Ha ha Ha ha Ha ha Ha Ha Ha Ha -- When will I EVER stop HAVING FUN?!! Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:43:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20031124203717.EA9D91A867E@smtp.infolink.com.br> Message-ID: <87vfp8xsix.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 >>>>> ">" == listas writes: >> 1. What's the current state of Red Hat Eclipse? The packages tell >> it's 2.1.x but the about box reports many plugins at 2.0.x. This was a bug in that particular release... the plugins are lying. It really is 2.1.0-ish. >> 2. I got sucess compiling Java classes using only gcj/libgcj but I >> could not find a way to run them using gij, so I had to configure a >> Sun JVM. That was the end of my free software java ide. :-( I think we've fixed this internally. Andrew wrote a patch to tell eclipse about gij as a java runtime. You could probably make it work by making a tree with various symlinks in it. I think Mark Wielaard did that once. Also, note that once you do get this working, you still won't be able to debug with the JDT. gij doesn't support JDWP, this is a known issue. >> 3. Any plans to support native Java compilation using gcj? It would be nice. I don't think anybody is working on it ATM. We're taking patches :-) >> 4. Plans to update to the latest CDT (1.2.0)? It has many nice >> features that weren't on previous releases. Internally we're running 2.1.1 with CDT 1.2.0. I'm not sure when we'll be releasing it publicly. Tom