public inbox for ecos-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@ecoscentric.com
To: ecos-bugs@ecos.sourceware.org
Subject: [Issue 1000693] flash.c assertion failure
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090303145944.088FA3B40033@mail.ecoscentric.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-1000693-13@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>

http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000693





--- Comment #3 from Bart Veer <bartv@ecoscentric.com>  2009-03-03 14:59:42 ---
Adding a flash driver in user space is not a common requirement, but
the synthetic target can be rather more dynamic than a physical board.
I can think of other scenarios where it might be desirable, for
example a board with the SPI signals on an expansion connector and
hooked up to an external dataflash. Some people may prefer to instantiate
the dataflash device in application space rather than update the platform
HAL and the target definition.

So, adding CYGHWR_IO_FLASH_DEVICE_USERSPACE is probably the sensible
way to go. The flash3.c test would then need a #ifdef on that option.
Unfortunately that means the test won't actually be run very often -
only when the application developer has explicitly enabled that
option.

I am not sure why you think _USERSPACE should implement
CYGHWR_IO_FLASH_DEVICE twice? Are you worried about the case where
there are zero flash devices in the target definition and >=2 flash
devices in user space? If so, having two implements properties would
indeed be the safe solution.

Bart


-- 
Configure issuemail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the issue.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-03 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-22 19:42 [Bug 1000693] New: " bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-03 13:16 ` [Bug 1000693] " bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-03 14:59 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2009-03-19 11:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-20 20:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
     [not found] <bug-1000693-13@http.bugzilla.ecoscentric.com/>
2010-07-17  4:55 ` [Issue " bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090303145944.088FA3B40033@mail.ecoscentric.com \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@ecoscentric.com \
    --cc=ecos-bugs@ecos.sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).