public inbox for ecos-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@ecoscentric.com To: ecos-bugs@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Issue 1000693] flash.c assertion failure Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:59:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20090303145944.088FA3B40033@mail.ecoscentric.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-1000693-13@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000693 --- Comment #3 from Bart Veer <bartv@ecoscentric.com> 2009-03-03 14:59:42 --- Adding a flash driver in user space is not a common requirement, but the synthetic target can be rather more dynamic than a physical board. I can think of other scenarios where it might be desirable, for example a board with the SPI signals on an expansion connector and hooked up to an external dataflash. Some people may prefer to instantiate the dataflash device in application space rather than update the platform HAL and the target definition. So, adding CYGHWR_IO_FLASH_DEVICE_USERSPACE is probably the sensible way to go. The flash3.c test would then need a #ifdef on that option. Unfortunately that means the test won't actually be run very often - only when the application developer has explicitly enabled that option. I am not sure why you think _USERSPACE should implement CYGHWR_IO_FLASH_DEVICE twice? Are you worried about the case where there are zero flash devices in the target definition and >=2 flash devices in user space? If so, having two implements properties would indeed be the safe solution. Bart -- Configure issuemail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the issue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-03 14:59 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2009-02-22 19:42 [Bug 1000693] New: " bugzilla-daemon 2009-03-03 13:16 ` [Bug 1000693] " bugzilla-daemon 2009-03-03 14:59 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message] 2009-03-19 11:20 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-03-20 20:28 ` bugzilla-daemon [not found] <bug-1000693-13@http.bugzilla.ecoscentric.com/> 2010-07-17 4:55 ` [Issue " bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20090303145944.088FA3B40033@mail.ecoscentric.com \ --to=bugzilla-daemon@ecoscentric.com \ --cc=ecos-bugs@ecos.sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).