From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20747 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2011 19:57:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 20733 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jul 2011 19:57:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 19:57:34 +0000 Received: by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3EE532F78009; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 20:57:33 +0100 (BST) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001253] Kernel tests on small memory targets X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Other X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 19:57:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20110704195731.3928D2F7800B@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011/txt/msg01007.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001253 --- Comment #15 from Sergei Gavrikov 2011-07-04 20:57:26 BST --- (In reply to comment #14) > Even if to expand 3/8 limit is a bad idea, may be it has a sense to > try to play with the divider's values? I tested that a bit. Well, it was possible to get more resources for the test tuning the dividers, but, by my opinion that is a something misplaced, I mean to add new ifdefs for xx_Kib targets in the kernel tests. May be it's better to add stub inclusions for some critical tests, e.g. #ifdef CYGPKG_KERNEL_TESTS_tm_basic_LIMITS #include CYGPKG_KERNEL_TESTS_tm_basic_LIMITS #endif etc. Then any HAL designer would overwrite those defaults after a testing the new values on real hardware. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.