From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4597 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2011 08:15:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 4574 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jul 2011 08:15:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:15:12 +0000 Received: by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix, from userid 48) id E3B9B2F78009; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 09:15:10 +0100 (BST) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001253] Kernel tests on small memory targets X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Other X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: ilijak@siva.com.mk X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:15:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20110705081503.17FB52F7800B@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011/txt/msg01008.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001253 --- Comment #16 from Ilija Kocho 2011-07-05 09:14:56 BST --- (In reply to comment #14) > Some thoughts on `tm_basic` limits. My first question, Ilija, did you > manage runs for CYG_HAL_STARTUP = RAM? I think you did not. You tried to > get at the least two running threads in `tm_basic` on 32K target. I haven't tried SRAM startup on 32K. However, I did play with stacks (IRQ and threads) sizes and I did gain more threads, but when it came to preparation of the patches I tried to make them non-intrusive for both large and small memory targets - to run tests with default settings. I am aware that there are many ways to optimize tests for memory but again, the question is how many new targets shall we gain. IMO small target treatment does not involve only the tests but also other optimizations such as dedicated small memory template(s). IRC we once came to small targets question during review of Stellaris port... CU. Ilija -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.