From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-bugs-return-8113-listarch-ecos-bugs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20689 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2011 17:25:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 20662 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jul 2011 17:25:46 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 17:25:32 +0000
Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013592F7800C
	for <ecos-bugs@ecos.sourceware.org>; Tue,  5 Jul 2011 18:25:32 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id bdBlKgyvH4ue; Tue,  5 Jul 2011 18:25:30 +0100 (BST)
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org
To: ecos-bugs@ecos.sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug 1001253] Kernel tests on small memory targets
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos
X-Bugzilla-Component: Other
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: ilijak@siva.com.mk
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: low
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
In-Reply-To: <bug-1001253-13@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>
References: <bug-1001253-13@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 17:25:00 -0000
Message-Id: <20110705172529.0A7E12F7800D@mail.ecoscentric.com>
Mailing-List: contact ecos-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <ecos-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-bugs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-bugs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-bugs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-bugs-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011/txt/msg01023.txt.bz2

Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001253

--- Comment #23 from Ilija Kocho <ilijak@siva.com.mk> 2011-07-05 18:25:26 BST ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> (In reply to comment #20)
> 
> > To me both are obvious. I think it is not necessary explaining max to eCos
> > programmer :)
> > 
> > > #ifndef max
> > > #define max(X,Y) ((X) > (Y) ? (X) : (Y))
> > > #endif
> 
> No, this is not explanation :-) This is a *reminder* that such a check and
> definition should be *above* its usage. FYI: there is the same definition
> for min() in the test.
> 

I meant complete max() definition. Kind of explains what

#define NTEST_THREADS \
  (__NTEST_THREADS >= NTEST_2_THR ? __NTEST_THREADS : NTEST_2_THR)

does.

> Then I did correct myself (comment 18) and offer N_THREADS_AVAIL for
> naming.

Yeah, i saw it but too late, sorry.

> > 
> > NTEST_2_THR was intended to mean constant 2. If you don't like it we
> > can keep the original (bare 2).
> 
> As for me "bare 2" is preferred there.

Set.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.