From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30057 invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2011 09:22:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 30050 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Dec 2011 09:22:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 09:22:02 +0000 Received: by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix, from userid 48) id 72F1F2F78013; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 09:22:01 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001397] I2C driver for Kinetic microcontrollers X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: tf+bugs.ecos@r-finger.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 09:22:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20111224092158.8998C2F78013@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011/txt/msg01468.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001397 --- Comment #7 from Tomas Frydrych 2011-12-24 09:21:52 GMT --- (In reply to comment #5) > As there is existing devs/i2c directory, I propose following path: > - devs/i2c/freescale/ OK, but the situation is exactly the same for the SLCD controller, and so we end up with bits under devs/ and bits under hal/misc, with no clear logic for the distinction I can see. > where is the name of this particular freescale spi instance > (typically as referred to in ref. man.). The services have only generic names in the Freescale RMs, so we end up with very generic names. That is fine if Freescale only make a single i2c controller and never will design another one, perhaps that is the case? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.