From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4901 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2012 20:38:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 4878 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Feb 2012 20:38:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:37:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645282F7800E for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 20:37:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CnytWPYsy5Sf; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 20:37:47 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-bugs@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001397] I2C driver for Kinetic microcontrollers X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: ilijak@siva.com.mk X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:38:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20120207203741.F1B3B2F78009@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001397 --- Comment #13 from Ilija Kocho 2012-02-07 20:37:36 GMT --- Hi Tomas I'm sorry for this delay. You have placed things such as IRQ priorities in HAL rather than with device CDL which is not an usual practice. On second consideration I realized that it is good to have IRQ priorities at HAL because they are being resolved by HAL (NVIC). Next step was a logical consequence: Why not consolidate all IRQ priorities and put them togeteher. Anyway it's not priority what counts but relative priority differences between IRQs.So I introduced the same to all drivers and it took some time. You can find update at bug Bug 1001450. Now little discussion on your driver. Recently I worked on DSPI so this quiestion is based on that experience and it may or may not have snse here: -Can I2C clock be defined on device basis like at SPI? Next is general, could it be possible to provide user with option to set I2C speed (clock) rather than prescaler value? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.