From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 666 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2012 16:20:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 645 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Mar 2012 16:20:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:20:15 +0000 Received: by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8A86A2F7800D; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:20:12 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001468] eCos GNU tools 4.6.2 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Other X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jifl@ecoscentric.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:20:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20120313162008.DADB32F78009@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012/txt/msg00609.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001468 Jonathan Larmour changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jifl@ecoscentric.com --- Comment #32 from Jonathan Larmour 2012-03-13 16:20:04 GMT --- (In reply to comment #31) > > I am quite busy this week but might find some time to build a new test release > based on GCC 4.6.3. I'm not sure if we should apply Jifl's GDB patch for the > 'g' packet reply issue or continue with the current "set tdesc" workaround > until the merge of his patch with other changes has occurred and we can apply > something which reflects the upstream changes. Comments? There's still a bit of discussion (due to uncertainty on my part in fact), but you can be pretty confident something similar to the following (post-merge) patch will be applied: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00377.html Or you can leave it out if you don't intend these tools to be the final tools. But IMO we shouldn't ship a GDB without something akin to this fix being included. Jifl -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.