From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-bugs-return-9223-listarch-ecos-bugs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6471 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2012 08:52:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 6464 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Mar 2012 08:52:46 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:52:08 +0000
Received: by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9B83B2F78015; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:52:07 +0000 (GMT)
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org
To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug 1001537] kernel: porting to GCC 4.6
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos
X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: low
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
In-Reply-To: <bug-1001537-777@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>
References: <bug-1001537-777@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:52:00 -0000
Message-Id: <20120320085206.24DB22FB082C@mail.ecoscentric.com>
Mailing-List: contact ecos-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <ecos-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-bugs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-bugs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-bugs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-bugs-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012/txt/msg00652.txt.bz2

Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001537

--- Comment #3 from Sergei Gavrikov <sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com> 2012-03-20 08:52:05 GMT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Strictly in mbox1 and kmbox1, we could add a block around the bit in #ifdef
> CYGMTH_MBOX_PUT_CAN_WAIT and declare i there. i.e.
> 
> #ifdef CYGMTH_MBOX_PUT_CAN_WAIT
>   {
>      int i;
> ....
> 
> I'd prefer that, but it's no big deal. Everything else is fine.

Thank you. Agreed. The fix has been updated (attachment 1651).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.