From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2233 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2013 18:35:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-bugs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2222 invoked by uid 89); 18 Apr 2013 18:35:33 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:35:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6924680013 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:35:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cycCBcSXa0v2; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:35:25 +0100 (BST) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-bugs@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001764] Enhancement of MMC/SD over SPI driver Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:35:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Disk X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: mjones@linear.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEEDINFO X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email, use the link below. http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001764 --- Comment #14 from Mike Jones --- I took several micro cards and plugged them into the larger carrier and tested on the K60 Tower, leaving the code to use response[3]. The SanDisk Ultra 8GB micro SDHC 1 does not respond to the init command 40 00 00 00 00 95. The Samsung 4GB micro SDHC discussed earlier and having problems does not respond to init command 40 00 00 00 00 95. The SanDisk 2GB micro SD responds to the init command... and fails in this code: if ( 1 == disk->sd_csd_version) { // There is information available about the file format, e.g. // partitioned vs. simple FAT. With the current version of the // generic disk code this needs to be known statically, via // the mbr field of the disk channel structure. If the card // is inappropriately formatted, reject the mount request. if ((0 != MMC_CSD_REGISTER_FILE_FORMAT_GROUP(&csd)) || (0 != MMC_CSD_REGISTER_FILE_FORMAT(&csd))) { return -ENOTDIR; } } // Acco Just like the SD 2GB mentioned in the last comment. Next steps will be to move to my custom board with micro connector and test. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.