* AW: at91sam9x35
[not found] <1363645533949-225742.post@n7.nabble.com>
@ 2013-03-20 8:22 ` Richard Rauch
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Richard Rauch @ 2013-03-20 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'andrea_91', ecos-devel
Hi Andrea,
I do not have a at91sam9x35 hardware on my place, but we have made ports already for Atmel AT91SAM9X25 and AT91SAM9G45.
This ports you are able to find at our Server: www.tiprom.itrgmbh.com
Specially the mentioned ports are located here:
http://www.tiprom.itrgmbh.com/projects/ecos-on-atmel9g45
and
http://www.tiprom.itrgmbh.com/projects/ecos-on-atmel9x25
This ports differs a bit (because of different customer requests), but we are planning to merge them later on.
Anyway, you could save a lot of time, if you will base your work on this ports.
The peripherials of the Atmel microcontroller are mostly identically, so I assume, you could use most of the drivers without any change!
Best Regards
Richard
Richard Rauch
email: rrauch@itrgmbh.de
_______________________________________________
ITR GmbH Informationstechnologie Rauch
web: http://www.itrgmbh.de
email: info@itrgmbh.de
Büroaddresse:
Business Terminal West, 3. Stock
Muggenhofer Strasse 136
90429 Nürnberg
phone: +49 (0) 911 / 32 609 86- 8
Sitz:
Schnepfenreuther Hauptstrasse 27b
D-90425 Nuernberg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Richard Rauch
Handelsregister: Nuernberg HR B 21676
USt-Id Nr. : DE228051873
_______________________________________________
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org [mailto:ecos-devel-
> owner@ecos.sourceware.org] Im Auftrag von andrea_91
> Gesendet: Montag, 18. März 2013 23:26
> An: ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org
> Betreff: at91sam9x35
>
> hi i'm doing eCos porting on board Atmel: at91sam9x35.
> Well, now i did the memory mapping on plf_io.h file and then i created all other
> file for dbg port. If i try to debug to see if the dbg port works, on the putty
> terminal i see something similar to "G!ÙV@Øt÷TÖåëÅõëõõÑfçfçnçf£Qü", but
> i'd wanted to write "Hello world\n". I know that this is a possible error of baud
> rate but the baud rate on putty and on ecos are correct(115200).
> Have you got some ideas about?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://sourceware-
> org.1504.n7.nabble.com/at91sam9x35-tp225742.html
> Sent from the Sourceware - ecos-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread