From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12314 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2006 23:14:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 12301 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Feb 2006 23:14:21 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from otoro.itis.ethz.ch (HELO otoro.itis.ethz.ch) (129.132.24.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:14:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by otoro.itis.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9475B388 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:14:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from otoro.itis.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (otoro [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19493-04 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:14:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from cadpad (adsl-114-193-zh1.datacomm.ch [212.254.114.193]) by otoro.itis.ethz.ch (Postfix) with SMTP id 06A605B380 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:14:12 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <028001c62785$724d25b0$1f01a8c0@haus.hellmutstrasse.ch> Reply-To: "oliver munz @ s p e a g" From: "oliver munz @ s p e a g" To: Subject: What is the reason of not using the same struct for usbs_rx_endpoint and usbs_tx_endpoint ??? Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:14:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0605-4, 01.02.2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at itis.ethz.ch Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 Im want my USB-driver to be able to change dynamical his endpoint configurations... I dont't really understand the difference between the usbs_rx_endpoint and usbs_tx_endpoint struct's. I want use only one of them, and fill it with the rx- or tx-functions. I think the only problem i can get, are the optional static IO-entry for the USB-endpoints. But maybe its the better idea to make IO-entrys in a USB-Class like CDC Package... Is there somebody who can see other problems in using "usbs_rx_endpoint" as tx-endpoint? Thanks for any answer Oliver Munz