From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25072 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2006 08:46:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 25062 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2006 08:46:43 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:46:40 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FGuJU-0008Pl-00; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 09:46:32 +0100 Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:46:00 -0000 To: "Doyle, Patrick" Cc: "'ecos-devel@sources.redhat.com'" Subject: Re: flash_v2 status Message-ID: <20060308084632.GA32333@lunn.ch> References: <3EDBCCE80E95E744A99895CA464987C4A7D28A@dtcsrvr09> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EDBCCE80E95E744A99895CA464987C4A7D28A@dtcsrvr09> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 From: Andrew Lunn X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:52:04PM -0500, Doyle, Patrick wrote: > Greetings fellow travellers, > > Could somebody tell me what the current status of flash_v2 is? Did I miss > an announcement that it had been merged into the main tree? (entirely > possible) I found a message from Jani asking the same thing last June. Any > thoughts? Such a merge is potentially disruptive. So it was planned to happen at the next major release of eCos. This will happen then all the FSF issues are resolved...... Andrew