From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17569 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2009 05:13:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 17550 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jun 2009 05:13:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:13:03 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1MGnPA-0006Wf-00; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:09:48 +0200 Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:13:00 -0000 From: Andrew Lunn To: jerzy dyrda Cc: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org, ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] eCos on STR9 ? Message-ID: <20090617050948.GB16074@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: jerzy dyrda , ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org, ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org References: <48A1755F.3000400@jaeger.mine.nu> <200906161838.35631.jerzy.dyrda@kontron.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200906161838.35631.jerzy.dyrda@kontron.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 > What's wrong with ST processors that they aren't so widely supported > compering to Atmel product? Situation in other "small" OS like > FreeRTOS is only a bit better. I happened to get two AT91SAM7 development boards for free and found it an interesting SoC. So i ported eCos for fun. If i had received a couple of ST7 boards instead, eCos would probably be running on them instead. I don't know the ST7 SoC well enough to know the pros/cons compared to the AT91SAM7 devices. Andrew