From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30273 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2009 09:21:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 30261 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Aug 2009 09:20:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.158) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:20:52 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so1052371fga.21 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:20:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.18.34 with SMTP id 34mr4079640fgr.2.1250673649405; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:20:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.gmail.com ([86.57.137.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm6547201fga.4.2009.08.19.02.20.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:21:00 -0000 From: Sergei Gavrikov To: John Dallaway Cc: Simon Kallweit , ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: lwIP port status Message-ID: <20090819092259.GA16837@sg-ubuntu.local> References: <4A1173B6.5000805@intefo.ch> <24603788.post@talk.nabble.com> <4A66F713.5030700@intefo.ch> <4A8ADDED.5010400@dallaway.org.uk> <4A8AE5D2.4050305@intefo.ch> <4A8BA58D.8020805@dallaway.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A8BA58D.8020805@dallaway.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:11:09AM +0100, John Dallaway wrote: > I can certainly test on an x86 PC target. I think Sergei Gavrikov has > also been experimenting with your port (probably on ARM). Are there any > volunteers to perform a basic sanity check of the eCos port on a > big-endian target? Hello John, Simon Unfortunately, I ran in some issues when I tried lwip-20090722 on ARM http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/2009-07/msg00223.html It was not possible to build lwip tests because new package had not a few interface functions are used by io/eth/lwip/current/src/eth_drv.c lwip_set_addr(), lwip_dhcp_init(), lwip_dsr_stuff(). Old eCos lwip package has those implementations. Perhaps, I missed something. May be I have to implement those in HAL? AFAIR I tweaked something in simple.c to compile lwip_tcpip itself. My "memory sticks" are at home. May be I had installed/built the package/tests in a wrong way. I used eCos CVS. The steps were rm -r $ECOS_REPOSITORY/net/lwip_tcpip cp -a net/lwip_tcpip $ECOS_REPOSITORY/net ecosconfig new lwip_eth ... Well, I did stop my attempts then. Waiting for new Simon stuff. Simon, if I missed some things, forgive my stupidity. Both, thank you for your persistence and your efforts! Regards Sergei