From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23630 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2006 14:53:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 23614 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2006 14:53:40 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from webapps.arcom.com (HELO webapps.arcom.com) (194.200.159.168) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:53:37 +0000 Received: from [10.2.2.14] ([10.2.2.14]) by webapps.arcom.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 15:52:43 +0100 Message-ID: <448596BD.30304@arcom.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:53:00 -0000 From: David Vrabel User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bert Thomas CC: ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: bug in RedBoot ELF loader? References: <44857F82.1020302@brothom.nl> In-Reply-To: <44857F82.1020302@brothom.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jun 2006 14:52:43.0574 (UTC) FILETIME=[DDBB0560:01C68978] X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 Bert Thomas wrote: > > Example: > > An ELF file with 2 segments: > segment 0: offset in file = 0, length = 0xac > segment 1: offset in file = 0xac, length = 15 An ELF with a section having a file offset of 0 looks bogus to me. Why would you need to load the ELF header into RAM? David Vrabel -- David Vrabel, Design Engineer Arcom, Clifton Road Tel: +44 (0)1223 411200 ext. 3233 Cambridge CB1 7EA, UK Web: http://www.arcom.com/