From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16325 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2008 19:50:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 16270 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Nov 2008 19:50:12 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net (HELO elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.68) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:49:32 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=tlaFreLbgCvVWC1fvmeAFDOPyF80x7SrRvuoOo/9UvaEkdwBZhm1a6J8QPwG+wRs; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [68.187.234.178] (helo=[192.168.0.5]) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1L3c0J-0005ut-7B; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:49:23 -0500 Message-ID: <492710C2.1050708@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:50:00 -0000 From: Frank Pagliughi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Kallweit CC: "Frank J. Beckmann" , "ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org" Subject: Re: lwIP References: <4926E654.2050302@barda.agala.net> <4926E76F.70307@intefo.ch> <4926EBF8.5060708@intefo.ch> In-Reply-To: <4926EBF8.5060708@intefo.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 4d82f965df0f6dd9e3f977c6d1ea408f0a9da525759e2654e3c04ce3c31945f2dde74f39500b6ac9a30146a21c727840350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 68.187.234.178 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 Simon Kallweit wrote: > Simon Kallweit wrote: >> Frank J. Beckmann wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> are there plans for updating eCos' lwIP port to a more recent version? >> >> I was planning on doing that, if it's not already planned for the >> ecos 3.0 release. I don't know if eCosCentric has a more up-to-date >> port. I'm currently working on a GSM/GPRS service for our STM32 based >> boards, which has to be quite memory efficient. I'm planning on using >> lwIP, and if there are features not currently available in the port, >> I guess I'm forced to do a port of a more up-to-date release. > > I just had a quick look of the lwIP in the current ECOS version. It > differs just very slightly from the actual lwIP 1.1.1 release, not > many changes. I guess an update to a more recent lwIP version should > be pretty simple and straight forward. I'll start working on it in > around a week, have to get my GSM modem working first :) > > Simon > > Excellent! If I'm not mistaken, the ppp code in the current eCos version is broken. An update would be welcome. Frank