From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26419 invoked by alias); 29 May 2009 18:53:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 26408 invoked by uid 22791); 29 May 2009 18:53:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from alicia.2020media.com (HELO alicia.2020mail.com) (212.124.192.215) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 May 2009 18:53:30 +0000 Received: from [212.124.199.38] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by alicia.2020mail.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1MA7CU-000GlJ-4k; Fri, 29 May 2009 19:53:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4A202F21.7060000@zynaptic.com> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:53:00 -0000 From: Chris Holgate User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yuvraj dodia CC: ecos-devel@sourceware.org Subject: Re: problem with USB slave-side Serial driver References: <351088.64786.qm@web95305.mail.in2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <351088.64786.qm@web95305.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 yuvraj dodia wrote: > Hi, > > i want to test USB support Added for STM32 in eCos. For that i have added stm32-usb-20090519.epk pacakge and got "ST STM3210E USB EVAL board" in templates and able to add STM32 USB driver and it compiles fine. > > Now i am trying to add "USB slave-side Serial driver" package to test the driver. But i am getting 2 unresolved conflicts saying "CYGHWR_IO_USB_SLAVE_OUT_ENDPOINTS >= 1" and "CYGHWR_IO_USB_SLAVE_IN_ENDPOINTS >= 1". It looks as though I should be setting CYGHWR_IO_USB_SLAVE_OUT_ENDPOINTS and CYGHWR_IO_USB_SLAVE_IN_ENDPOINTS in the STM32 driver CDL. I'll add it to the list of changes I need to make. Hopefully I'll get the time this weekend to make a new code drop. Might even get the serial class driver tested too... > I try to do same exercise for Atmel evaluation board (EB40) but get same conflicts, looks like some thing wrong with my configuration. > > So can somebody tell me what is wrong with my environment? Probably nothing wrong at your end. It's beta code so it's expected that there will be some wrinkles - and it's much appreciated when you report them! Chris.