From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7746 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2009 13:33:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 7731 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jun 2009 13:33:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from d5152C2DE.access.telenet.be (HELO lx-dmz.televic.com) (81.82.194.222) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:33:11 +0000 Received: (qmail 3748 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2009 13:33:07 -0000 Received: from srv-vs06.televic.com (10.0.0.46) by lx-dmz.televic.com with (RC4-MD5 encrypted) SMTP; 3 Jun 2009 13:33:07 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.0.56.4) by SRV-VS06.TELEVIC.COM (10.0.0.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.291.1; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:33:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4A267B93.3040401@televic.com> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:33:00 -0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Lambrecht?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Lunn CC: "john@dallaway.org.uk" , "ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org" , Deroo Stijn Subject: Re: Re: NAND review References: <20090603085115.GA27508@lunn.ch> In-Reply-To: <20090603085115.GA27508@lunn.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 Andrew Lunn wrote: >> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:17:58 +0100 >> From: John Dallaway >> To: Andrew Lunn >> CC: eCos Maintainers >> Subject: Re: NAND & YAFFS >> >> Have you been able to form a view on the relative merits of the VU >> Amsterdam and eCosCentric implementations so far? Just wanting to ensure >> that this process is not stalled for any reason... >> >> John Dallaway >> > > > There was an email from Rutger that Televic are willing to contribute > their drivers for an AT91SAM9260 based board. If that happens, it > would mean two real implementations for Rutgers, vs one for Ross. > > Indeed, we would like to contribute, but it takes time... Stijn will try to do the contribution, I will get the FSF copyright assignment (but the site is down today..). Kind regards, Jürgen > Andrew >