From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4955 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2009 06:38:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 4945 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Aug 2009 06:38:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail05.solnet.ch (HELO mail05.solnet.ch) (212.101.4.139) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:38:37 +0000 Received: from mail05.solnet.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail05.solnet.ch [127.0.0.1]) (SolNet-Check, port 10024) with LMTP id Vc370KqXz306; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.intefo.ch (static-212-101-18-64.adsl.solnet.ch [212.101.18.64]) by mail05.solnet.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A87239BBE; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.intefo.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (beta.intefo.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id f3iZ2ZaNj1as; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:38:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.20] (simon.intefo.ch [192.168.1.20]) by beta.intefo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28FA7701D8; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:38:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A94D872.3000606@intefo.ch> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:38:00 -0000 From: Simon Kallweit User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergei Gavrikov CC: ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: lwip 1.3.1 testing References: <4A8E48C2.10802@intefo.ch> <20090821184336.GA24882@ubuntu.local> <20090824201853.GA10163@ubuntu.local> <4A938008.70909@intefo.ch> <4A939599.8040703@intefo.ch> <20090825120820.GA11701@ubuntu.local> <20090825203324.GA6140@ubuntu.local> In-Reply-To: <20090825203324.GA6140@ubuntu.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:08:20PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:41:13AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I have done a new lwip test release with the following changes: >>> >>> * incorporated Sergei's patch (ctrl-c support) >>> * added an lwip_eth_simple and lwip_eth_sequential template >>> >>> The new test release can be downloaded from >>> http://download.westlicht.ch/lwip-20090825.tar.gz >> [snip] >> >>> Testing on real hardware would be especially useful. Also testing on >>> big-endian targets might reveal some issues, as I've only been testing >>> on little-endian platforms. >> Hi >> >> Simon, I'll retest new package ASAP. And it seems for me that you would >> get more volunteers if you will announce your nowadays work with those >> minimal setup instructions on the ecos-discuss list too. Thanks for a >> tip about the host's side setup for nc test, I will try it too. > > I retried nc master/slave test with your template and suggested pbuf > values. For synthetic (I used tap interface) I got good results with > lwIP, but, for real target, nc test passed for 100% master load and no > load of slave side only. I got about 2Mbits per second with the DM900 > Ethernet driver (that driver is too slow, it uses memcpy() on every 4 > bytes arrived or sent), and my board gives only about 15 VAX Mips for > RAM startup, and it seemed for me that was normal result. Did you use the old lwip port on that board too? Did you get similar results in performance? > For small TCP packets ("y\n"), I had got good results > > yes | socat - tcp4::7 ;# some stress tcp stream > > "tcpecho" test did return "y" very long time, until I did break pipe > (^C). > > Unfortunately, I could not manage "udpecho" using socat as above neither > for synthetic nor real hardware. So, my today score for lwIP 1.3.1 is > > + http_simple > + http_sequential > + ns_slave_test > + tcpecho > - udpecho > > What was your way to test "udpecho"? I used nc (netcat) to send/receive UDP packets. But I did no stress testing with tcpecho, udpecho. Simon